>>Needs more AA, but pretty interesting none the less.
> 
> 
> More AA? No, I don't think so, AA is present here. What you see are the
> textures of the different elements, I guess.

OK, well maybe it's just because the image is too small to see the 
texturing properly then? IDK.

Either way, my original comment stands; it _is_ an interesting picture. 
I kinda like it.

Post a reply to this message